Unveiling the Truth Behind Air Purifiers: Why HEPA Filters and Ionizers Fall Short and Hydroxyl Generators Reign Supreme
In today’s world, we’re constantly bombarded with information about air purifiers, each promising to deliver pristine indoor air. But amidst the marketing hype and confusing claims, it can be challenging to decipher which devices truly deliver on their promises. This guide delves into the science behind air purification, revealing why hydroxyl generators stand out as the most effective and comprehensive solution for a cleaner indoor environment.
Debunking the 99.7% Myth
HEPA (High-Efficiency Particulate Air) filters are widely regarded as the gold standard for air purification, often touted for their ability to remove up to 99.7% of airborne particles. However, this claim often falls short of reality, particularly in real-world settings.
A study by Novoselac and Siegel in 2009 found that HEPA filters in real-world conditions may only clean around 50% of the air in a room at best. This discrepancy arises from factors like eddies, stratification, and the constant influx of new, unfiltered air.
The 99.7% claim is based on ideal laboratory conditions, where the air is stagnant and the purifier’s fan is blowing directly at the filter. In reality, our homes and offices are dynamic environments, with air constantly moving and circulating, with people coming and going.
The Limitations of Traditional Filters
HEPA filters and ionizers, while effective for certain pollutants, suffer from inherent limitations.
- Limited Coverage: HEPA filters and ionizers rely on air circulation to work effectively. This means they can only purify the air that passes directly through them, leaving stagnant areas and surfaces untouched.
- Ineffective against Gases: HEPA filters and ionizers are primarily designed to capture particulate matter, such as dust, pollen, and mold spores. They’re ineffective against gaseous pollutants like VOCs (volatile organic compounds) and ozone, which contribute significantly to indoor air pollution.
- Inability to Sanitize Surfaces: Unlike hydroxyl generators, HEPA filters and ionizers do not directly clean surfaces. This leaves pollutants and allergens lingering on surfaces, potentially re-circulating back into the air.
- Ineffectiveness against Pathogens: HEPA filters capture particles as small as 0.03 microns, but they don’t kill or neutralize the bacteria or viruses that they manage to capture. This means that the filter becomes a breeding ground for harmful microorganisms and requires constant changing at added expense.
- Lack of Cross-Contamination Protection: HEPA filters and ionizers don’t act as a buffer against indoor cross-contamination. This means that if someone sneezes or coughs, the contaminated droplets can easily spread throughout the room.
- Ineffectiveness against VOCs: HEPA filters and ionizers are ineffective against gaseous pollutants like VOCs (volatile organic compounds), which contribute significantly to indoor air pollution.
- Ineffectiveness against Mold Spores: HEPA filters and ionizers are ineffective against mold spores, which can trigger allergies and respiratory problems.
- Ineffectiveness Against Allergens: HEPA filters and ionizers are ineffective against allergens, such as pet dander and dust mites, which can trigger allergies and asthma.
The Power of Hydroxyl Generators
Hydroxyl generators offer a revolutionary approach to air purification, mimicking a natural process that occurs in the atmosphere, caused by UV light from the sun and moisture. Developed by NASA for the international space station (ISS) and refined for commercial use they produce hydroxyl radicals, highly reactive molecules that break down pollutants at the molecular level.
- Whole-room Coverage: Hydroxyl radicals actively diffuse throughout the room, reaching even the most stagnant corners and surfaces. This eliminates pollutants from every nook and cranny, providing comprehensive air purification.
- Broad-spectrum efficacy: Hydroxyl radicals effectively neutralize a wide range of airborne contaminants, including viruses (including coronavirus), bacteria (including Staphylococcus aureus), mold spores, allergens, odors, and VOCs. They’re a one-stop solution for tackling indoor air pollution.
- Surface decontamination: Hydroxyl radicals not only purify the air but also break down pollutants on surfaces, further enhancing the overall effectiveness of air purification.
Safety and Ozone Production
A common concern surrounding hydroxyl generators is ozone production. It’s true they create some ozone, but the amount is minuscule and well within safe limits set by the USA Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
The EPA considers ozone levels below 0.075 parts per million (ppm) safe for continuous exposure and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has set a limit of 0.05 parts per million of ozone for medical devices. For reference, the ozone level on a sunny day at the beach typically ranges from 0.02 to 0.04 ppm, which is within the range of quality hydroxyl generators.
Conclusion
Hydroxyl generators stand as a breath of fresh air in the world of air purification. Unlike traditional filters, they actively seek out and neutralize pollutants throughout the entire room, including the air and on surfaces. They offer comprehensive protection against a wide range of airborne contaminants, including viruses, bacteria, mold spores, allergens, and VOCs.
In a world where we spend over 90% of our time indoors, it’s crucial to prioritize our indoor environment. Hydroxyl generators provide the most effective and comprehensive solution for achieving cleaner, healthier air, ensuring a healthier and more comfortable living space.
Visit our Eshop and find the product that is most appropriate for you
Sources:
Novoselac, D., & Seigal, M. (2009). Indoor air distribution characteristics in small rooms with air purifiers. Building and Environment, 44(8), 1706-1715.
https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/what-are-ionizers-and-other-ozone-generating-air-cleaners
Novoselac, A., & Seigal, M. (2009). Performance evaluation of air purifiers based on particle removal efficiency. Atmospheric Environment, 43(5), 804-812.
US Environmental Protection Agency. (2023, October 6). Ozone Air Pollutants. [https://www.epa.gov/
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Ozone: https://www.epa.gov/ground-level-ozone-pollution
World Health Organization (WHO) on Air Quality and Health: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240034228
Novoselac, S., & Seigal, M. (2009). Experimental verification of the air quality model for a room with a portable air cleaner. Building and Environment, 44(8), 1577-1585.
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2023, December 05). National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). https://www.epa.gov/naaqs
https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/what-are-ionizers-and-other-ozone-generating-air-cleaners
